The beacon can run continuously; the transponder needs scheduling
The spacecraft is a tumbling 1U with body-mounted silicon cells on five faces, so energy is the limiting resource. The 48 Wh battery is large compared with any single eclipse. What limits operations is the orbit-average energy balance.
1. Solar generation
Each face carries 6 cells at about 0.20 W (AM1.5), giving 1.64 W per face at AM0. The cells are on five faces (±X, ±Y, −Z); +Z is the antenna cap. For a randomly tumbling cube each face averages |cos θ| = ¼, so the mean sunlit input is 1.25 face-equivalents = 2.05 W before losses.
| Loss factor | Multiplier |
|---|---|
| Cell temperature (+50 C, -0.45 %/C) | 0.89 |
| LT3652 input regulation (8.44 V) vs 2S Vmp | 0.90 |
| Blocking Schottky (CDBA240LL) | 0.96 |
| Cover / EVA encapsulant | 0.97 |
| Radiation & UV degradation (EOL, 2 yr) | 0.96 |
| LT3652 charger efficiency | 0.85 |
| Combined | 0.609 |
The net sunlit power into the battery is 1.25 W. At 525 km the orbit period is 95.1 min, and the worst-case eclipse (β = 0°) is 35.7 min (38 %), giving an orbit-average of 0.78 W.
Show data table
| β (deg) | Generation (W) | Eclipse fraction |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.779 | 0.375 |
| 5 | 0.780 | 0.375 |
| 10 | 0.782 | 0.373 |
| 15 | 0.785 | 0.370 |
| 20 | 0.790 | 0.367 |
| 25 | 0.797 | 0.361 |
| 30 | 0.805 | 0.354 |
| 35 | 0.816 | 0.345 |
| 40 | 0.831 | 0.334 |
| 45 | 0.850 | 0.318 |
| 50 | 0.877 | 0.297 |
| 55 | 0.913 | 0.268 |
| 60 | 0.969 | 0.223 |
| 65 | 1.073 | 0.140 |
| 70 | 1.247 | 0.000 |
| 75 | 1.247 | 0.000 |
| 80 | 1.247 | 0.000 |
| 85 | 1.247 | 0.000 |
| 90 | 1.247 | 0.000 |
2. Loads by operating mode
| Mode | FC + sensors | LTM | Magnetorquers | Heater | Total (W) | Continuous-use balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Detumble (LEOP) | 0.172 | 0.000 | 0.300 | 0.000 | 0.472 | ✓ +0.31 W |
| Safe | 0.122 | 0.278 | 0.000 | 0.100 | 0.499 | ✓ +0.28 W |
| Beacon (telemetry only) | 0.191 | 0.484 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.675 | ✓ +0.10 W |
| Transponder (typical load) | 0.191 | 2.669 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 2.860 | ✗ -2.08 W deficit |
| Transponder (max load) | 0.191 | 3.652 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 3.843 | ✗ -3.06 W deficit |
Flight controller 3.3 V loads (datasheet-typical)
| Load | mA @ 3.3 V | mW | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| RP2350 MCU (150 MHz active) | 30.0 | 99.0 | DS |
| Flash / PSRAM / SD NAND (avg) | 3.0 | 9.9 | DS |
| IMU LSM6DSO + mag LIS2MDL | 0.8 | 2.6 | DS |
| MCP23017 GPIO expander | 1.0 | 3.3 | DS |
| INA219 x2 power monitors | 2.0 | 6.6 | DS |
| I2C muxes / buffers / watchdog / RTC | 3.0 | 9.9 | DS |
| Face sensors x5 (MCP9808, VEML7700, TCA4311A) | 3.5 | 11.5 | DS |
| Antenna-cap + battery sensors (TMP112, VEML6031) | 1.0 | 3.3 | DS |
| MCP25625 CAN controller (LTM on) | 5.0 | 16.5 | DS |
The 3.3 V rail comes from the TPS54226 at 85 % efficiency (Eco-mode). The magnetorquers add an estimated 0.30 W during detumble only. The battery heater (1.0 W element) is budgeted at 10 % duty in safe and cold cases.
LTM supply current (public AMSAT figures, 5 V LTM_VSYS)
| LTM mode | mA | mW at LTM |
|---|---|---|
| safe | 40 | 200 |
| beacon | 70 | 348 |
| transponder | 475 | 2375 |
| transponder_max | 650 | 3250 |
The beacon figure is a 310 mA transmit current at about 11 % duty over a 40 mA baseline. Transponder current is 300–650 mA depending on uplink loading. The TPS54225 rail is modelled at 72 % efficiency at light load and 89 % at heavy load (forced-CCM part).
3. How much transponder time?
Show data table
| β (deg) | Max duty (%) |
|---|---|
| 0 | 4.7 |
| 5 | 4.8 |
| 10 | 4.9 |
| 15 | 5.0 |
| 20 | 5.2 |
| 25 | 5.6 |
| 30 | 5.9 |
| 35 | 6.4 |
| 40 | 7.1 |
| 45 | 8.0 |
| 50 | 9.2 |
| 55 | 10.9 |
| 60 | 13.4 |
| 65 | 18.2 |
| 70 | 26.2 |
| 75 | 26.2 |
| 80 | 26.2 |
| 85 | 26.2 |
| 90 | 26.2 |
Result. At worst case the transponder can run about 69 minutes per day. That's enough for roughly 7 ten-minute passes over high-demand regions. Commanded or battery-gated scheduling is required. Ways to increase transponder time:
- Triple-junction cells (about 29 % vs about 22 % for Si) would add about 30 %.
- Higher-β orbits (dawn-dusk SSO) give up to 26 % duty.
- Cells on the +Z cap.
- Reducing LTM output power at low uplink load.
Assumptions to verify
- The cell Pmp of the KXOB101K08TF (datasheet) and a measured face I-V curve under AM0-equivalent light.
- The LT3652 operating point with a 2S face (see open items).
- LTM current in each mode, measured on the FlatSat through the FC's TLM3 (LTM_VSYS) channel and INA219.
- The orbit and LTAN from the Transporter-22 manifest, which set the β-angle history.
Model source: analysis/power_budget.py.